Tuesday, 3 March 2015

FOI Request: SERAP Sues Okonjo-Iweala Over Missing N30tn

FOI Request: SERAP Sues Okonjo-Iweala Over Missing N30tn


A civil society organization, Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, (SERAP) has filed a suit before the Federal High Court in Lagos against the Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala for allegedly failing to to provide information about how the alleged missing N30tn was spend.

SERAP in the suit, which is sequence to a Freedom of Information request made by SERAP to Mrs Okonjo-Iweala dated 2nd February 2015, argued that the Minister “As trustee of public funds has a legal duty to render account on the missing N30tn to the beneficiaries (Nigerians) of the trust, if and when called upon to do so.”

The organization is seeking “a declaration that by virtue of the provisions of Section 4 (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2011, the Defendant is under a binding legal obligation to provide the Plaintiff with up to date information relating to the spending of the alleged missing N30tn, which represents some accruable income to the Federal Government in the past four years including: a) any receipt, however described, arising from the operation of any law; b) any return, however described, arising from or in respect of any property held by the Government of the Federation; c) any return by way of interest on loans and dividends in respect of shares or interest held by the Government of the Federation in any company or statutory body.”

SERAP in an affidavit attached to the suit claimed that Mrs Okonjo-Iweala “As trustee of public funds has a legal duty to render account on the missing N30tn to the beneficiaries (Nigerians) of the trust, if and when called upon to do so."

SERAP’s suit followed disclosure by the former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Prof. Chukwuma Soludo that over N30tn had been missing, or stolen, or unaccounted for, or simply mismanaged under the minister’s watch.

The applicant also submitted that “a necessary implication of the rule of law is that a public functionary and institution can only act in accordance with law, as to do otherwise may enthrone arbitrariness. Obedience to the rule of law by all citizens but more particularly those who publicly took oath of office to protect and preserve the constitution is a desideratum to good governance. In a democratic society, this is meant to be a norm; it is an apostasy for public official like the Minister of Finance to ignore the provisions of the law.”

SERAP also argued that plaintiff “has so far failed, refused and/or neglected to provide the Plaintiff with the details of the information requested. By virtue of Section 1(1) of the FOI Act 2011, the Plaintiff is entitled as of right to request for or gain access to information which is in the custody or possession of any public official, agency or institution. By the provisions of Section 2(7) and31 of the FOI Act 2011, the Defendant is a public official.”

 “By virtue of Section 4 (a) of the FOI Act when a person makes a request for information from a public official, institution or agency, the public official, institution or urgency to whom the application is directed is under a binding legal obligation to provide the applicant with the information requested for, except as otherwise provided by the Act, within 7 days after the application is received. By Sections 2(3)(d)(V) & (4) of the FOI Act, there is a binding legal duty to ensure that documents containing information relating to spending of the alleged missing N30tn is widely disseminated and made readily available to members of the public through various means,” the organization also said.

According to the organization, “The information requested for, apart from not being exempted from disclosure under the FOI Act, bothers on an issue of National interest, public peace and security, public concern, social justice, good governance, transparency and accountability. The Defendant will not suffer any injury or prejudice if the information is released to the Plaintiff.”

The organization also argued that, "Unless the reliefs sought herein are granted, the Defendant will continue to be in breach of the Freedom of Information Act, and other statutory responsibilities. It is in the interest of justice to grant this application as the Defendant have nothing to lose if the application is granted."

“As a key agency of government, the Ministry of Finance has a sacred duty to ensure that the country’s resources and wealth is used solely to fulfil the basic economic and social rights of all Nigerians and achieve the country’s overall socio-economic development. This implies providing strong leadership in the efforts to curb public sector corruption, and to refer to appropriate anticorruption agencies any allegations of corruption in which any agencies of government may be involved or officials of your Ministry may be complicit,” the organization also argued.

“Therefore, it is necessary to provide clarity as to what exactly happened to the missing N30tn if the Ministry of Finance is to continue to play a leadership role in the transparent and accountable management of the country’s resources and wealth, and to enjoy the public trust and confidence essential for the Ministry’s effectiveness and impact,” the organization further stated.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the application as the plaintiff is yet to file her reply.

6 comments:

  1. Just like in the case of the PwC audit report that a former CBN governor erroneously raised, the Minister will surprise and silence all her critics by soon releasing the demanded report and these groups will keep their mouths permanently under lock and key. This much I know. Stay tuned!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Onofowokan Michael4 March 2015 at 08:20

    We should start asking ourselves some very critical questions in this country. How did this unregistered partly clandestine group get access to a piece of information that is highly classified public document? We must now know those that are filtering information to the dreaded and monstrous groups like the Boko Haram. If not so long as it is yet to be on government’s White paper, the information remains a classified. SERAP must explain how it got its access to it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is it just alright to for an unknown group like SERAP to sue a hardworking Minister like Okonjo-Iweala for an imaginary “missing” sum of money? My take is that Nigeria is about the only country where hardwork is a vice rather than a virtue. What a paradox

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is another case of political opportunism at work. When you see groups like these your first instinct is that they are in dear need of their “share of national cake”. This is the most logical explanation you can give to this action as exemplified by a group of beggars who only serve the interests of those who can pay their price! .

    ReplyDelete
  5. Under the cover of human right activism, a lot of these so-called human rights or civil society groups are committing fraud and breaking laws. It can be tolerated when patriotism is involved but in a situation where the primary motivation is strongly selfish and not altruism then we need to start raising very pertinent questions about the true intents of these so-called groups.

    ReplyDelete
  6. BENJAMIN OKEDARA4 March 2015 at 08:35

    I recall the same opposition now represented by SERAP went aflame when the former CBN governor Sanusi Lamido made similar allegations about a year ago. They became co silent when the international audit firm PwC released the report. All the Minister's critics will soon permanently shut up.

    ReplyDelete