FoI Act Applicable To All States In Nigeria, Says Appeal

FoI Act Applicable To All States In Nigeria, Says Appeal 

The Court of Appeal sitting in Akure, the Ondo State capital, has ruled that Nigerian states have no powers to reject any requests filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FoI).

The Court ruled that the requests for information, especially around public expenditure, under the FoI, are made in public interest and should be honoured by all states across the country.

A three-member panel of the Court gave the ruling in an appeal filed by a journalist, Martins Alo, against the Speaker of Ondo State House of Assembly and Auditor-General of the state.

Alo had demanded the audited report of Ondo State Government between 2012 and 2014 to properly access how public funds are utilised in the state.

His request was,however rejected by the authority concern, prompting him to seek judicial redress.

Akure Division of Ondo State High Court had previously ruled in 2016 that the journalist had no right to demand how the state was spending money.

The lower court presided over by Justice Williams Akintoroye ,ruled that the FoI was not applicable to states and the request was not in public interest to begin with.

Akintoroye, also said Alo should pay a damage of N10,000 for wasting time and resources of the state.

But Mr Alo’s lawyer, Femi Emodamori, appealed the ruling on behalf of his client, arguing that Mr Akintoroye erred in his judgment and that his client was acting in public interest.

But Court of Appeal judges who sat on the matter which included Uzo Ndukwe-Anyanwu, Obande Ogbuinya and Ridwan Abdullahi, rejected Mr Akintoroye’s ruling and agreed with the appellant that the FoI was applicable to states and it was in public interest for the state government to release its audited report.

Ndukwe-Anyanwu wrote the lead opinion, saying Mr Alo has a right to act on behalf of the public to obtain the information from state authorities. He also quashed the N10,000 fine imposed by the lower court.

“In a democratic dispensation, such as the Nigeria’s, the citizens have been proclaimed the owners of sovereignty and mandates that place leaders in the saddle,” Mr Ogbuinya said in his concurring opinion.

The citizens have a right to know details of “expenditure of public funds generated from their taxes,” Ogbuinya added.

It would be recalled that states, including Lagos, Adamawa, Akwa-Ibom and Ondo, have been rejecting FoI requests relating to their activities since the law was signed in 2011 by former President Goodluck Jonathan.

The states argued that the FoI is a federal law and its provisions are simply not binding on their respective jurisdictions, frustrating accountability efforts by media outlets and transparency advocates.

Speaking on the development, a rights activist , Inibehe Effiong said, “The decision of the Court of Appeal is consistent with well-established principles of legislation.”

Effiong said, “By virtue of paragraph four and five in part two of the second schedule of the Constitution, the states should know that the National Assembly can make laws with respect to the archives and pubic records,” he said. “The FoI Act is a law that stipulates how the public should have access to public record.”

“Even if a State House of Assembly makes a law about how the public should have access to public record, such law would only be subservient to a similar one passed by the National Assembly.

‘I am not surprised by the judgement. The states too know this but they’re just wasting public funds in challenging the matter, he added.

“Only international treaties and instruments could be domesticated, you don’t need to domesticate a federal law,” the lawyer added.

“Anyone who is aggrieved should proceed to the Supreme Court, but I am confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the ruling of the Court of Appeal.”