Wednesday, 8 July 2015

Update: Coroner's Court calls for Prosecution Of Synagogue, Contractors Over Building Collapse

Update: Coroner's Court calls for Prosecution Of Synagogue,  Contractors Over Building Collapse

The Lagos State Corner, Magistrate Oyetade Komolafe yesterday called for the investigate and prosecute of the Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN) over its failure to secure the necessary permit and approval before commencing the construction of the collapsed structure.

The Coroner also recommended that the contractors, Oladele Ogundele and Akinbela Fatiregun, who were in charged of the construction of the collapsed building be investigated and prosecuted for criminal negligence by the relevant authority.

Magistrate Komolafe further asked relevant authorities to carry out detailed "fitness for habitation test" on all the structures/building withing the premises of the church.

The Coroner in its verdict also held that the building collapsed due to structural failure caused by the combination of designs, detailing errors and foundation fuilure.

He also concluded that the death of the 116 victims of the collapse was consistent with blunt force trauma that would normally be sustained from a collapsed building.

According to the coroner the victims are made up of 60 males, and 56 females; among whom was a boy aged 6 years and that 6 bodies are yet to be identified

He also stated that 85 of the victims are of South African origin while others are 22 Nigerians, 2 Benenois and 1 Togolses.

It will be recalled that the Lagos State Government had  set up the Inquest under the state Coroner’s System Law No.7 of 2007 to investigate the cause and circumstances resulting in the death of 116 people, mostly foreigners.

However, in spite of repeated summons issued on him by the Coroner the founder of the church, Prophet Temitope Joshua refused to appear before the inquest.

Joshua instead of appearing to testify before the inquest had gone before the Lagos State High Court to challenged the jurisdiction of the Coroner's Court to conduct the investigation and to summon him.

He had also urged the court to declare that the Coroner had exceeded the jurisdiction of a coroner's court by delving into areas that were beyond its scope.

Alhough his application was dismissed by Justice Lateefa Okunnu for lack of merit, Joshua had further ran to the Court of Appeal to overturn the high court decision.

Joshua, had initially linked the tragedy to a strange aircraft wandering above the building shortly before it fell.

A video which was released by the church on the social media platforms showed the plane allegedly hovering around the six storey building which served as a guest house for foreign worshippers, before its collapse .

However in it verdict, Magistrate Komolafe dismissed the suggestion holding that there is no evidence before the court to support the claim.

Magistrate Komolafe also called for the transfer of the Divisional  Police Officer, Ikotun Police Station, CSP Haruna Alaba from the Division for unprofessional conduct.

He recommended that government agencies responsible for monitoring and inspection at very stage of construction should be alive to their responsibility and vigilant.

The Coroner also urged the government in the alternative to outsourced the function of monitoring and inspection to competent professional body that will detect violation of building laws and regulations early before any failure.

Magistrate Komolafe further called on government to get rid of corruption,  including issuance of fake receipt and greasing of palms during inspection on construction works on site.

He also asked government, NGO and other ancillary bodies to educate and sensitizing the public on the need to always allow the Statutory/First Responders perform their duties during rescue operation/emergency cases and not take over the duties.

The Coroner further recommended that government should make it mandatory for professional involved in the design and supervision of major structural building construction to have professional indemnity.

A total of 32 witnesses testified while 45 exhibits were tendered doing the proceedings.

While adopting his final address, counsel to SCOAN, Olalekan Ojo maintained that external forces remains a responsible cause of the building collapse.

Ojo cited the testimony of a 37-year-old graduate of Chemistry from the University of Maiduguri, Mr. Biedomo Iguniewe, who had suggested that the building may have collapsed due to infrasonic radiation, Ojo said Biedomo's evidence was never contradicted.

The lawyer also argued that the non existence of a building plan for the collapsed building as alluded to by the Lagos State Government has nothing to do with the structure of the building which he insisted was built according to standard.

He further submitted  that the contract for the collapsed building was proper contracted to competent engineers and if anyone must be questioned for the building collapse, it should be the engineers and not the Synagogue church.

Ojo advised the Lagos State Government to take appropriate steps to regularise the building construction and approval applications shown to be pending with the relevant state agencies.

However, the Lagos State Government in it own submission stated that the inquest must be guided by section 40 of the coroners law which bestows on it the role to find out who the deceased are, when and how they died.

The government noted that since the issue of who the deceased are and when they died had been resolved by the pathological report prepared by the state  chief medical director, Prof John Obafunwa, the inquest must only concern itself with how they died.

The state pointed out that in finding how the deceased died, its postulated four issues which the quest should resolve in its favour: They include: lack of access to the collapse building site, illegality in the construction of the building, alleged sabotage and structural defect.

The government urged the inquest to resolve the issues in the interest of justice using the body of evidence and testimonies of witnesses and experts which were unchallenged.

ECA: FAAC faults Okonjo-Iweala, denies approving $2bn withdrawal

ECA: FAAC faults Okonjo-Iweala, denies approving $2bn withdrawal


The Federation Account Allocation Committee on Tuesday faulted
comments credited to a former Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi
Okonjo-Iweala, that it approved the withdrawal of $2bn from the Excess Crude Account.

The committee, in a statement issued on its behalf by Forum of Finance
Commissioners in Abuja, stated that the law setting it up did not give it the power
to approve withdrawals from the ECA.
Okonjo-Iweala had while responding to allegations made by state governors that
she made withdrawals from the ECA without authorisation, said issues relating to
expenditure were usually discussed at FAAC meetings attended by finance
commissioners of the 36 states of the federation.
She had said through a statement issued by her spokesperson, Paul Nwabuikwu,
“The allegation by some governors that former Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi
Okonjo-Iweala, spent $2.1bn out of the Excess Crude Account ‘without
authorisation’ is false, malicious and totally without foundation.
“It is curious that in their desperation to use the esteemed National Economic
Council for political and personal vendetta, the persons behind these allegations
acted as if the constitutionally recognised FAAC, a potent expression of Nigeria’s
fiscal federalism, does not exist.
“But Nigerians know that collective revenues, allocations and expenditures of the
three tiers of government are the concern of the monthly FAAC meetings.”
But reacting to the ex-minister’s comments, the committee said in its statement
that Okonjo-Iweala’s expalnation “is far from the fact and is misleading.”
It said, “It has come to our notice the statement credited to the former
Coordinating Minister of the Economy and Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-
Iweala, that the Federation Account Allocation Committee approved the
withdrawal from Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of $2bn. This
statement is far from the fact and is misleading.
“We wish to state unequivocally that FAAC does not have the authority to approve
withdrawals from the ECA and, therefore, could not have approved the withdrawal
from the Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of $2bn.
“According to the law setting up FAAC, which pre-dates the ECA, it cannot
approve withdrawal and has not done so in the past.
“If anything, FAAC, as records of its meetings indicate, had often queried the
activities on the ECA, and, therefore, did not decide any withdrawal.”
The statement noted that while FAAC had in December 2014 observed the
withdrawal of $2bn from the ECA, the then Minister of State for Finance and
Chairman of FAAC, Bashir Yuguda, had when asked during the plenary of FAAC
meetings of the respective months explained that former President Goodluck
Jonathan gave approval for the withdrawals to pay oil marketers’ subsidy claims.
Yuguda reportedly stated that the action would be ratified by NEC.
FAAC stated in the statement, “It should be noted, therefore, that FAAC did not
and could not have approved nor taken the decision to withdraw the sum of $2bn
from the ECA.
“We would want to excuse Dr. Ngozi Okonjo Iweala on this misrepresentation
because she was not in attendance during FAAC plenary and may not have been
fully and adequately made abreast of every FAAC activity.”
But Okonjo-Iweala, while reacting to the finance commissioners’ statement on
Tuesday, said the approval for the withdrawal of the funds was given by former
President Goodluck Jonathan.
She said in a statement by Nwabuikwu, “Payments made were used for petroleum
subsidies for the Nigerian people and were approved by Mr. President. Therefore,
there is no question of mismanaging any resources here.
“For the avoidance of doubt, at no time did Dr. Okonjo-Iweala say that FAAC
approved such expenditures. What she said was that all these expenditures were
discussed at FAAC meetings attended by finance commissioners from the 36
states.
“It is, therefore, clear that there was no misrepresentation by Dr. Okonjo-Iweala.
“The question before us is: why is there such an excessive attempt to batter her
name in an attempt to damage her reputation? It is clear, as I said in my previous
statement, that the motive is malicious and very political, and, therefore, will not
succeed.
“If monies were used to pay for subsidies for the Nigerian people and duly
approved, why is Okonjo-Iweala’s name being battered in this way? This
persecution should stop.”

States need fiscal balance, not bailout – Punch

States need fiscal balance, not bailout – Punch

 

The report that President Muhammadu Buhari has approved the release of N713.7 billion intervention funds for the federal and state governments
to pay workers’ salaries should bring relief to civil servants who have
been bearing the burden of a drastic fall in oil revenues for some time
now. But the bailout should be seen as a palliative; the harsh forces
of economics demand that government at all levels learn how to live
within their means. The package contains N413.7 billion from special
intervention funds and about N250 billion to N300 billion to be
advanced as a soft loan to states by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Also,
the Debt Management Office will assist the insolvent states to
reschedule their over N660 billion bank loans.

So far, no fewer than 24 states have failed to pay salaries, some with a
backlog stretching up to 10 months. How the workers are surviving
under such a condition cannot cease to marvel. But no state chief
executive has been able to capture the stark realities of the situation
in as vivid a manner as the Osun State Governor, Rauf Aregbesola. In
an address to declare open the sixth Assembly of the state, the
governor painted a picture of total gloom and helplessness. Aregbesola
said he met a wage bill of N1.4 billion, upon assuming the mantle of
leadership in 2010. But, egged on by an unprecedented financial
windfall, fuelled by unparalleled boom in the oil trade, the wage bill
shot up to N3.5 billion by the end of 2012. At the same time, the
statutory allocation to the state from Abuja only recorded a marginal
increase of about N400 million, from N2.1 billion to N2.5 billion.
The Osun State scenario is not by any means peculiar; it actually
offers an insight into what obtains in states across the country. In his
comments at the Adegoke Adelabu Memorial Lecture in Ibadan last
year, the Oyo State Governor, Abiola Ajimobi, said the state’s wage bill
of N2 billion he inherited had more than doubled to N4.6 billion. Today,
it stands at about N5.2 billion, while the monthly allocation of N4
billion collected last year has plummeted in line with the current
dwindling oil revenues. In Rivers State, where the wage bill has
ballooned from N2.5 billion to N9.2 billion in the last eight years,
former governor Rotimi Amaechi said the monthly allocation had
reduced by 50 per cent.
Most of the governors have blamed their dire financial situation on the
minimum wage increase of 2011; but not many have been honest
enough to admit that the entities they preside over are mere cost
centres that cannot deliver development. At the slightest opportunity –
as was evident during the last National Conference – a motley group
of agitators demand the creation of new states. None of them ever
gives a thought to the viability of such states. So, rather than play the
role of agents of development, states now encourage laziness, and
wait, arms folded, for manna to fall from Abuja.
Perhaps, the time has come for a reappraisal of the states as they are
currently structured. As the immediate past Lagos State Governor,
Babatunde Fashola, said recently, there is the need to merge states
that are not viable so that the burden borne by one state can be
evenly sustained when two or more are bonded together. This makes a
lot of sense given that the country fared much better when there were
just three or four regions – salaries were more readily paid and
development delivered effortlessly. Some of the landmark
achievements in the South-West, such as the establishment of the
first television station in Africa, creation of industrial estates, the
building of the Cocoa House and a network of roads, among others,
were products of a period when the current five states were just one
entity, the Western Region.
By then, the federating units – Western, Eastern, Northern and Mid-
Western regions – were run as a business, producing their resources
and paying tax to the centre. Today, our states have become beggarly,
surviving mainly on hydro-carbon revenues.
The public finance approach of running government as a business
should be re-introduced in our national life. Contiguous states have to
pool resources and work towards self-sustenance in the true spirit of
federalism. They should review their fiscal management style in tune
with the current realities. For instance, how many of them have taken
a look at the staff strength of their civil service within the period that
their wage bill had been ballooning? How many of them have done a
biometric audit of their staff to weed out “ghost” workers?
At the level of the governors and their retinue of aides, it is important
to note that the pressure they put on wages is out of proportion to
their relevance. Apart from the need to cut down on the number of
commissioners and other aides, reviewing their bloated remunerations
has become imperative. The same goes for House of Assembly
members. The time has come to see politics as an opportunity to
render service; not to amass wealth. The newly-elected Governor of
Kaduna State, Nasir el-Rufai, Ajimobi and a few others have already
taken the right step by cutting the number of their commissioners.
These are short-term measures. Fiscal repair will not come overnight;
it requires serious planning and a strong political will to take difficult
decisions. In the long run, states should work assiduously for a
constitutional review that will enable them to explore and exploit
minerals within their territories. That is exactly what federalism is all
about.

U.S. jets intercept Russian bombers off California, Alaska coasts

U.S. jets intercept Russian bombers off California, Alaska coasts


On July 4, two pairs of Russian Tupolev Tu-95 bombers approached the United States (U.S.) West coast, causing the Air Force to scramble to intercept the planes before they breached U.S. airspace.

Fox News reports that the first incident occurred at
10:30 am ET off the coast of Alaska, when NORAD
identified the Russian planes and two F-22s hurried
to intercept them. Another incident occurred at 11
am ET off the coast of central California, and was
responded to by two F-15s.

The Russian bombers they intercepted are capable of
carrying nuclear weapons, but sources do not
indicate whether or not they were armed.

The Air Force intercepted the bombers before they
entered America’s sovereign air space, which
extends 12 miles out from the coast, but the
presence of the bombers is an ominous sign during
the heightened tensions between Russia and the U.S.

As retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney,
who formerly commanded the North American
Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) told the
Washington Free Beacon: “It’s becoming very
obvious that Putin is testing Obama and his national
security team.”

The type of warfare being teased is reminiscent of
the Cold War not only in theory, but in practice.

“These long-range aviation excursions are
duplicating exercises I experienced during the
height of the Cold War when I commanded the
Alaska NORAD region,” McInerney told the Free
Beacon.

Pentagon officials haven’t given the exact location of
the interceptions, but ABC News cites one official as
saying that it could have taken place as “far out as
200 miles.”

The Pentagon’s John Kirby told the Free Beacon that
they assessed the flight of the Russian bombers as
another training activity.

Monday, 6 July 2015

We have no plans to arrest Ekweremadu – Police

We have no plans to arrest Ekweremadu – Police


The Nigeria Police Force has stated categorically that it has no plans to arrest
deputy senate president , Ike Ekweremadu or blackmail him in a bid to force him
to relinquish his position as deputy senate president .

It would be recalled that the Peoples Democratic Party had alleged that the
police in conjunction with the ruling All Progressives Congress are scheming to
force Ekweremadu to step down as deputy senate president .

In a reaction to the accusation, Abayomi Shogunle , Deputy Force Public Relations Officer ( Public Information Officer /Spokesperson) wrote what really transpired on Twitter.

“ The Nigeria Police Force received a petition from a senator alleging
unauthorized substitution of senate document and the matter was referred to
Force CIID Abuja for investigation, ” he said .

He noted that : “ In line with the policy of the Police leadership of gathering
evidence before invitation, a letter was sent to the clerk of the national assembly
to facilitate a meeting of some principal senate members /clerk with Police
investigating team headed by DIG FCIID at their convenient time and venue.

“ No plans to arrest Deputy Senate President as Nigeria Police Force have healthy respect for democratic values , ” Shogunle said in a trilogy of tweets .

UPDATE: Over 40 killed in twin blast in Jos

UPDATE: Over 40 killed in twin blast in Jos


People gather at the site of suicide bomb attack at Redeem Christian church in
Potiskum, Nigeria, Sunday, July 5, 2015. (AP Photo/Adamu Adamu)
JOS, (AP) — Two bombs blamed on the Islamic extremist group Boko Haram
exploded at a crowded mosque and an elite Muslim restaurant in Nigeria’s central
city of Jos, killing 44 people, officials said Monday.
Sixty-seven other people were wounded in the attacks Sunday night and were
being treated at hospitals, said National Emergency Management Agency
coordinator Abdussalam Mohammed.
The explosion at the Yantaya Mosque came as leading cleric Sani Yahaya of the
Jama’atu Izalatul Bidia organization, which preaches peaceful co-existence of all
religions, was addressing a crowd during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan,
according to survivors who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
Another bomb exploded at Shagalinku, a restaurant patronized by state governors
and other elite politicians seeking specialties from Nigeria’s mainly Muslim north.
Jos is a hotspot for violent religious confrontations, located in the center of the
country where Nigeria’s majority Muslim north and mainly Christian south collide.
The city has been targeted in the past by bomb blasts claimed by Boko Haram
extremists that have killed hundreds of people.
Sunday’s attacks are the latest in a string blamed on Boko Haram that have killed
more than 200 people over the past week in northeast Nigeria.
The extremists returned Sunday to northeastern villages attacked three days
earlier, killing nine villagers and burning down 32 churches and about 300 homes,
said Stephen Apagu, chairman of a vigilante self-defense group in Borno state’s
Askira-Uba local government area.
He said the vigilantes killed three militants.
Boko Haram took over a large swath of northeastern Nigeria last year and stepped
up cross-border raids. A multinational army from Nigeria and its neighbors forced
the militants out of towns, but bombings and village attacks increased in recent
weeks, apparently in response to an Islamic State group order for more mayhem
during Ramadan. Boko Haram became the Islamic State group’s West Africa
franchise earlier this year.

Wednesday, 1 July 2015

Court Acquitts & Discharges Fani-Kayode On Money Laundering Charge

Court Acquitts & Discharges Fani-Kayode On Money Laundering Charge

Reprieve came the way of former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode as Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia of the Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday discharged and acquitted him of the money laundering charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia in her judgment on the case held that the anti-graft agency failed to prove it's case against Fani-Kayode beyond reasonable doubt.

The court also held that the prosecution team led by Festus Keyamo failed to prove the source of the money or that the former minister directed that the money should be paid into his account.

She also declared that the prosecution has failed to prove these elements saying it is necessary for sufficient and unequivocal evidences to be put before the court as to how the monies were lodged in the accused person's account.

The judge also dismissed the testimony of the 4th prosecution witness, Supo Agbaje as unreliable, vague and an afterthought as it contradicted his earlier statement to the EFCC.

Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia identified two issues for determination,  the first is that there was a cash deposit of a sum beyond the legal threshold and that the accused persons accepted or authorised the payment of the sum into his account.

Though the court agreed with the prosecution that the sums of N1 million and N1.1 million where paid into the account of the accused persons but the giver of the money remained unclear.

"The prosecution has not been able to adduce any credible evidence before the court to convince it that the accused person gave the money to anybody to pay into his account".

According to the court, in a case where the court is faced with contradictory evidence, the court must resolved the contradictions in the favour of the accused persons as the court can not pick and chose which of the evidence to believe.

The court also disagreed with the prosecution that the mere deposit of the said sum in the accused account is enough to nail him.

"I hold that the prosecution failed to prove it's case beyond reasonable doubt in line with Section 15 (1) of the Money Laundering Act and I am of the view that the accused person must be discharged and acquitted".

Fani-Kayode was arraigned before the court by the EFCC on a two count charge of laundering the sum of N2.1 million, while he was serving in President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration as Minister of Aviation and Minister of Culture and tourism.

He was specifically accused by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of conducting financial transaction exceeding N500,000, which was not done through a financial institution by accepting cash payment of various sum which was further carried in cash to First City Monument Bank Plc (FCMB)) through some of his associates. 

He pleaded not guilty to the charge.
  
It would be recalled that the former Minister was first arraigned sometime in December 23, 2008, before Justice Ramat Mohammed of the Federal High Court, Lagos on a 47-count charge.

He had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was admitted to bail in the sum of N200 Million with two sureties in like sum by the judge.

He was then re-arraigned before Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako in 2010, following the transfer of Mohammed from the Lagos Division.

Again, he was re-arraigned before Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia on February 11, 2013. after the transfer of Justice Murtala-Nyako to the Jos Division of the court.

He was later re-arraigned before Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia on March 6, following the amendment of the 47-count charge to 40-counts after the EFCC dropped seven of the counts.

It will also be recalled that Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia had in November last year dismissed 38 out of the 40 counts against the accused.

The judge, however, said the accused would need to prove his innocence in respect of counts 25 and 26 of the charges.

At the trial of the former minister, EFCC had called four witnesses, while the defence only called two witnesses.